[HCDX] RE: XEBAL 1470 AND ESPACIAL 1390
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[HCDX] RE: XEBAL 1470 AND ESPACIAL 1390



When Mr. Österholm "commented" our report from L'Ago, Liguria, several weeks ago arguing in Hard-Core Dx list that the same logs apparently were, we quote, "a severe mis-interpretation, a bad April joke or a result of a total lack of DX-experience", we firmly asked for his apologies.

We offered to send a duplicate of our tapes as an evidence of some loggings we always claimed were made in exceptional conditions. Indeed, far from a desire of insincere compliments and applause, as Mr. Österholm unfairly implies, we wanted that to be discussed, on a true scientific basis. He responds now with detailed arrogance and, far from apologizing, he is quite explicit in his accusations: given their many "question marks" our tapes might be counterfeited, and our loggings never happened, at least in the circumstances we described. Clearly, what we submitted was a sequence of excerpts extracted from an original recorded material which we never claimed to be continous. During all three sessions we pushed on the pause button several times, as many Dxers use to do with their cassette recorders. The seemingly fragmentary nature of our tape has been used - in good or bad faith - as a pretext to attach to it those insulting question marks.

Since Mr. Österholm original mistake now appears to having been actually aggravated by his "analysis" of the recordings we voluntarily submitted for peer reviewing, we believe we deserve some conclusive remarks on this sad story. But we don't want to stretch Hard-Core-Dx members' and our excellent host's patience beyond any understandable limit. For those of you wishing to get exhaustive information and our full response regarding this sad querelle, here's the link to our site, Faiallo.org:

http://www.faiallo.org/sequel.html

We do not intend to speculate further on such behavior. Several supportive messages we're receiving by highly respected members of our community seem to testify about a general willingness to refuse it as a whole. If reciprocal trust must be the strongest regulating force in serious technical debates on Hard-Core and other DX lists, we can't help feeling Mr. Österholm did actually make offensive - and let us say racist - assumptions and should really withdraw from these. It would seem Mr. Österholm is looking at his detailed albeit arrogant letter (and we take the opportunity to sincerely thank him for the precious time he and his friends devoted to us, with questionable results we must add) as a honorable way out. Well, it simply isn't. On the contrary, it makes for a double offense.

We wouldn't want to comment on the position of three other gentlemen involved in this hardly scientifical review, either. Mr. Henrik Klemetz has already published his apologies in an other list, and we thank him for that. If others, with Mr. Österholm, still believe our tapes were deceptively faked, we don't think there's much to add to our statement, except perhaps that we also regret heated expressions and bad feelings on our side in the past.


73s Rocco Cotroneo, Andrea Lawendel, Enrico Oliva Brasil and Italy --

---[Start Commercial]---------------------
World Radio TV Handbook 2002 is out!
You can get yours for $17.47 + shipping + possible tax in some states.
Please visit: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0823059332/hardcoredxcom
And while you buy it, you'll also support Hard-Core-DX. Thank you.
---[End Commercial]-----------------------
________________________________________
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
Hard-Core-DX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www2.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
_______________________________________________

THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
published by Michael Stutz at http://dsl.org/copyleft/dsl.txt