[HCDX] WRTH 2001 updates
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[HCDX] WRTH 2001 updates



My updates for Denmark, Faroe Isl. and Greenland in the radio section of the new WRTH 2001 were all included - so it's not old stuff all of it :-)

But don't believe the TV section for these countries. My updates here were not included. Not this year nor last year or ...   so very old info here, I'm afraid.
 
Another thing; Isn't it way out that the majority of the WRTH Receiver Review section is taken up by SCANNERS. What interest would a short wave listener, a DX'er or a broadcaster (who are the readers of WRTH) have in scanners!!  The only "normal" short wave receivers tested are Roberts R991 and a Grundig Satellit 800.  Also a tranceiver (sic) called Yaesu FT-840 is tested; dont think WRTH is read by many radio amateurs. Hmmm

Best 73s

Stig Hartvig Nielsen,
Denmark


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Jary" <rjary@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "ARDXC" <ardxc@xxxxxxxxxx>; "Hard Core DX" <hard-core-dx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 11:22 AM
Subject: [HCDX] Apologies


> I've just come home from a few days away and had a look at the new WRTH
> 2001 edition, and had a look at the Australian listings.
> 
> I would like to offer my apologies for anyone who went an bought the
> publication on the basis that the Australian listing has been updated as
> was publicised here by us, which might have made people think up to date
> information was being included.. I haven't checked other country lists
> and don't have the knowledge to say whether they are close to correct or
> not.
> 
> On behalf of the Australian Radio DX Club I spent a fair amount of time
> checking the listings and sending an updated list in the layout used by
> WRTH, and then to open it and find last year's section duplicated for
> Australia makes me pretty angry. To put it on record, the "payback" was
> a couple of ads for the ARDXC being included.
> 
> Basically, ignore any lists for Aussie expanded band stations in there.
> Ignore the 1720 kHz listing in the frequency section, that died 15-20
> years ago.
> 
> I will try and find the original document on my system and make it
> available to anyone who wants a list for Australia that bears some
> relation to reality.
> 
> And I will not waste my time sending updates to WRTH or it's publishers
> anymore unless I am getting paid directly for that task.
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hard-Core-DX mailing list
> Hard-Core-DX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www2.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
> http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Copyright (c) 2000 Hard-Core-DX.com
> 
> Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Text. A copy of the license is available in http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.txt.
> 
> All the other copyright notices are VOID.
> 

_______________________________________________
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
Hard-Core-DX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www2.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
_______________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Hard-Core-DX.com

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Text. A copy of the license is available in http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.txt.

All the other copyright notices are VOID.