RE: [HCDX]: Why QSL? (was: Re: addresses)

[Per-Ole Stenman <per-ole.stenman@xxxxxxxx>]

I also know about the opposite. Finnish DX-er Mika Makelainen was visiting
some stations in New York years ago, and as a result of his visits WLIB New
York-1190 started to QSL listerners' reports again. WLIB still seems to
verify the reports quite regularly. 
Per-Ole



>Rubbish. For what do you ask your embassy to help you, if not with the
>intention to increase pressure on the station? Sorry to say so, but I think
>this is an unacceptable behaviour. I'm a keen QSL-collector too, but I don't
>think that this is the way we should try to "extort" QSLs.
>
>There are always stations unwilling to QSL. So what? Perhaps they will do so
>in 10 years. But after such an experience they won't certainly do it again.
>It's nothing but a bloody unfair practice to other DXers.
>
>73
>Martin
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This is a message from "Martin Elbe" <elbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>to hard-core-dx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe the list, send
>"unsubscribe hard-core-dx" in mail body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>For more information, please check http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
>or email us, staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a message from Per-Ole Stenman <per-ole.stenman@xxxxxxxx>
to hard-core-dx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list. To unsubscribe the list, send
"unsubscribe hard-core-dx" in mail body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For more information, please check http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
or email us, staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------